S04: Qing in the World
History of China Since 1800
January 12, 2026
Annoucement: FSP Info Session
FSP Info Session: History’s Foreign Study Abroad Program in London TUESDAY January 1/13/2026 5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
Join faculty and students to hear about the Dept. of History’s Foreign Study Program in London at University College London. Free dinner served.
Recap: Cult of filial piety
- Parent-child hierarchy as foundation of imperial legitimacy and local governance
- Relations between parent and child reinforced imperial power relations: “There is government when the prince is prince, and the minister is minister; when the father is father, and the son is son.”
Sources of stability
The Qing governed different parts of the empire differently. Within China proper, it continued to uphold:
- Imperial legitimacy: Mandate of Heaven
- Educated elites: Examination system
- Families and lineages: Filial piety
Debating the China Model
Montesquieu:
- Stagnation
- Rule by man, not by law
- Excessive despotism
State-society relations in tension:
- Governance on the cheap, growing population but shrinking bureaucracy and tax base
- Elite voluntarism vs. Vigilance against local power
Tensions in the China Model
Universal ideal…
- Late imperial Chinese governance was remarkably stable, built on an Emperor, scholar-bureaucrats, and Confucianism.
- “Benevolent government” meant minimal intervention, low taxes, and moral guidance.
- The Confucian bureaucracy unified the empire by promoting harmony order and universalism against local groups.
… and particularistic reality
- Magistrates – outsider, and overworked – depended on managing clerks, private secretaries, and gentry.
- The state’s reach in the countryside was limited by resources, finances, and local interests.
- Officials faced a conflict between bureaucratic duties and obligations to personal networks (family, friends).
Key questions
- Canton Trade: Qing in the World
- Opium: How did it create the modern world economy?
- The Great Divergence: What explains Qing’s decline?
Chinese Maritime Network: Selden’s Map
- The Selden map is a 17th-century wall map of East Asia, showing areas from Siberia to Java and Japan to Burma.
- It is named after John Selden (1584–1654), a lawyer and Oxford’s first rabbinic studies scholar.
- Selden donated the map to Oxford’s Bodleian Library as part of his collection of Oriental manuscripts.
Ming China in the World Economy: Domestic and Global Factors
- A network of trade developed around the South China Sea, involving merchants from tribute-paying states to the Ming dynasty, focusing on Chinese goods and grain.
- This trade relied on two key conditions: Ming’s ability to produce high-quality goods at reasonable prices; limited foreign access to Ming market.
- These stable conditions throughout the sixteenth century fostered a strong trading system, creating a “world-economy.”
Europeans in Asia
Portugese
- Arrived in Macao in 1557
- Established a trading post on a peninsula
- Arrival of Jesuit missionaries
Spanish
- Discovered Manila in 1570
- Found a trading community of Chinese
- Sangley Rebellion in 1639, resulting in the massacre of 17K-22K ethnic Chinese.
Dutch
- Set up base on Java, first in Bantam (1609), then Jakarta (Batavia)
- Aimed to compete with the Spanish in Manila
- Established a base in Taiwan in 1623, later ousted by Zheng Chenggong in 1662
- 1740 Batavia massacre: 10,000 ethnic Chinese+ were massacred
Rethinking European Influence in Maritime Asia
- The Spanish and Portuguese were able to integrate into regional trade in Asia thanks to monopoly of silver from the New World, especially Peru, Bolivia, and Mexico.
- Conventional wisdom suggests that economic modernity originated from a dynamic West European foundation, but the Europeans were not major players in Maritime East Asia yet.
- Certain Asian economies were more advanced than European economies until the Industrial Revolution.
China and Long Distance Trade
![]()
16th- & 17th-century trading empires
Tea, Silk, Porcelain: Chinese Export to the West
![]()
A selection of Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 CE) blue-and-white porcelain. From Chenghua reign, 1465-1487 CE. (British Museum, London)
An uncanny object
- What are we looking at?
- How did this figurine travel in time and space? Who were its makers / buyers?
- What can this object tell us about their makers and the world it was made?
Population Boom
- New crops like corn, sweet potatoes, and peanuts were integrated into farming, growing well in marginal areas and complementing existing grain crops.
- Improvements in irrigation, terracing, grain storage, tools, and organic fertilizers further enhanced food production.
- The rising population in turn placed pressure on arable land, prompting mass migration from densely populated areas to frontier regions to expand agricultural practices.
Trade within limits
- Like the Ming, coastal trade only permitted at designated ports
- Canton (Guangzhou) as sole port open for Western trade
- Revenue went to imperial treasury
- Fixed, seasonal trading period
- Mobility restriction: Special residential quarter for foreign merchants
Security merchant (cohong) system
- Canton trade system (1757-1842): Hong merchants acted as exclusive liaisons between American traders and Chinese government
- Hong merchants held licenses, controlled trade, and enforced regulations
- They purchased imports, arranged exports, ensured compliance
European grievances
- Only allowed to trade in Canton and live in designated quarters
- Subject to Qing law, with no diplomatic representation
A Revolution is a Tea Party?
![]()
W.D. Cooper. “Boston Tea Party.”, The History of North America. London: E. Newberry, 1789. Library of Congress
Tea Party: The Colonists’ Grievances
- Boston Tea Party: chests of Chinese tea into Boston Harbor December 16, 1773
- Target: Tea Act of May 10, 1773, which allowed tax-free tea sales by British East India Company in American colonies
- Sons of Liberty strongly opposed taxes in Townshend Act as rights violation and destroyed EIC tea shipment
Macartney Embassy, 1793-1794
- In 1794, Emperor Qianlong received Lord George Macartney.
- King George III of Great Britain – the same king against whom the American colonies rebelled in 1776 – dispatched Lord Macartney to China
- Qianlong dismissively informed the British that China had no need for any English goods or inventions, and sends him back to King George III empty handed.
- The British needed to balance a massive trade deficit fueled by tea addiction.
Macartney Embassy
- What did the Europeans want?
- Why didn’t they get want they want?
Discuss: Qianlong’s Letter
![]()
William Alexander: Emperor receiving the Embassy (1792-1794), British Museum WD 961, f.57(154)
Qianlong’s Letter to King George III
Hitherto, all European nations, including your own country’s barbarian merchants, have carried on their trade with Our Celestial Empire at Canton. Such has been the procedure for many years, although Our Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its borders. There was therefore no need to import the manufactures of outside barbarians in exchange for our own produce. […] But your Ambassador has now put forward new requests which completely fail to recognize the Throne’s principle to “treat strangers from afar with indulgence,” and to exercise a pacifying control over barbarian tribes, the world over.
Kowtow and Convenient Lies of History
Clash of civilizations?
China:
- Tianxia / “All under heaven”: concentric hierarchy of foreign relations
- Sino-centrism: China as “middle kingdom”
- Tribute system based on ritual submission
The West:
- Sovereignty and equality of nations
- Nations are free and independent of one another
- “Natural law”: law of nature applicable to nations
- Free trade as an inherent right: If abridged, a state had the right to enforce that freedom.
Or was it a meeting of equals?
- EIC vs. Cohongs: two government-recognized monopolies
- England vs. Qing China: two empires with universal pretensions
From mercantilism to free trade
Mercantilists
- Trade as zero-sum game
- Increase exports, decrease imports
- Connected to bullionism: wealth of nation = gold and silver reserves
- Trade restrictions: tariffs, monopolies, exclusive patents
Free Trade
- Division of labor: Comparative advantage, rather than absolute advantage
- Trade as mutually beneficial
- Less government intervention, lower trade barriers
- Financial system based on banking
Free trade as political doctrine
General obligation of nations to carry on mutual commerce.
ALL men ought to find on earth the things they stand in need of. […] The introduction of dominion and property could not deprive men of so essential a right; and, consequently it cannot take place without leaving them, in general, some mean of procuring what is useful or necessary to them. This mean is commerce; by it every man may still supply his wants.
Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
End of China Monopoly
- 1600: East India Company chartered to contest Portuguese control of East Indies
- 1834: End of EIC’s Trade Monopoly in China
Rise of Nation-States
- Congress of Vienna in 1815: A sovereign state recognized as having the ability to exert influence on a global scale.
- Powerful, centralized state as index of the level of progress and civilization
- Comity of nations based on mutual and equal sovereignty, regardless of size, wealth, or power
China’s Trade Surplus
- “Our Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its borders.”
- What does China want?
British-Chinese-Indian trade triangle
- Great Britain, exported opium grown in India and sold it to China
- Indian opium replaced silver as medium of trade
- The British used opium profits to purchase Chinese porcelain, silk, and tea
Missing element: American connection
Fur trade triangle:
- Boston ships sail around South America to exchange iron chisels for sea otter fur with the Native Americans on the northwest coast.
- Ships sail westward across the Pacific to trade fur for teas, silks, and other goods in Canton.
Cotton trade:
- British plantations produced opium in India and sold it in China.
- The silver was shipped to the United States to buy raw cotton.
- Raw cotton from the South shipped to England to manufacture cloth.
- English cloth was shipped to India, the proceeds of which then bought more opium.
- Opium provided liquidity for Britain to buy slave-produced American cotton.
Windfall from the East
- After the American Revolution, U.S. merchants started trading independently in the East Indies and challenged the monopoly of the British East India Company
- Mercantile wealth helped concentrate capital, create wealth, and establish modern business corporations
- Canton trade fed anti-British sentiment at the same time as it boosted American national spirit after independence
Debate: How should the Qing respond?
- Silver outflow: Trade surplus with England turned deficit in 1826
- Increasing opium smuggling
- Growing users and addicts: “the magistrate or governor who did not smoke opium was an exception”
Discuss: Lin Zexu’s Letter to Queen Victoria
- What is Lin Zexu’s message to Queen Victoria?
- How might his letter have been received in England?
Treaty of Nanjing
- 21 million silver taels of indemnity
- End of Cohong and Canton system
- Era of treaty ports: five coastal cities opened for foreign trade
- Extraterritoriality: foreign nationals subject to home laws for offenses in China
- Britain granted “most favored nation” status
“Sick man of Asia”
![]()
William Thomas Saunders, Opium Smoker (1867), Metropolitan Museum of Art
“Century of humiliation”
Opium War as the “First National Humiliation”: it “cut off the lifeblood of the state” and “threatened our people’s chance of survival.
China’s Destiny (1943)
New Opium War?
China was a painful victim of opium in history. […] But to our regret, some Americans believe that China is the primary source of fentanyl in the United States. Some even fantasize that China is shipping fentanyl to the United States “as a form of payback for the Opium Wars,” and that “North America has been flooded with precursor chemicals from China, stifling international efforts,” as I read from some opinion articles. These comments are false and misleading.
Chinese Ambassador Qin Gang Takes an Interview with Newsweek on the Fentanyl Issue, September 30, 2022